I think it is great that you are thinking deeply about the way your parenting affects your children.
It was my understanding that the postive parenting program was quite a good parenting program. They might not be as 'natural' as we parent our children, but they have a lot of success in helping families in a fairly appropriate way.
Obviously here on NP we spend a lot of time thinking about our parenting and what are the best methods for us. Tripple P is a program designed for parents who are more mainstream than us, and who may not accept the things we think about parenting, and who may not even be able to put the calm ways we parent into place as easily. Not meaning to be demeaning to these parents...but i think we can all agree that just like some parents dont want to take the time to use cloth nappies and put in that little bit more effort, the same would go for their parenting methods.
As a child care worker, and even just as a human on this earth i have seen some really horrible examples of parenting. These kind of programs actually do wonders for these families, avoiding chidren being put into the foster care system, and bringing nearly broken families back on track.
Bringing love and care back into families.
So i think they deserve a little more credit than we tend to give them here on NP.
I do agree with the linked articles though. I think that many chidren are over rewarded, and praised.
And i personally hate reward charts and bribery. But honestly in todays world of stresses these things REALLY do work for some family's.
ANd although there may be some proof that the outcome of these kind of rewards is not completely optimal for all children, the effect it has on the family as a whole could outweigh that.
So i was reading the first link;
http://www.naturalchild.com/robin_gr...ds_praise.html
I find the article very one sided and almost like propaganda*. The second part tends to help things make a bit more sense. But i would be horrified to think how some parents my take the "Praise is bad" stance this article seems to portray, and then not read the full article.
I have to agree that their are many chidren who we think have high self esteem because their parents have praised them and given them lots of rewards and made sure they have always seem so happy with everything thing they do.
One of the issues I have is the children brought up by parents who do not let their child see they are disapointed in their behaviour. Of course you can let them see that....that is a completely natural consequence. Its because you love them that you are disapointed in them, and i think children need to know that.
My mum used to always say to us, 'it is because i love you, and want you to learn the right thing to do and be safe', as a child i completely accepted that.
But I absolutely believe that there is a place in this world for praise.
Obviously the best of these praises are as Marmee has said her family do, are the natural and relating ones. Like having more family time because the chores were done quicker and without fuss.
And things like evaluting 'i like the way you made the paint brush go round in circles' than just a 'great work' comment.
But what about the children who dont understand that?
Babies and young toddlers?
What about children with disabilites???
I give CJ heaps of praise. I use clapping, and cheering and smiling, and the hand sign for 'good', and an ubundance of "you can do it'....'nearly there'....'that's it' 'you got it!' 'Wow' 'fantastic'.
If you watch a mother with a baby learning to sit, crawl, walk,
it seems that her natural instict is to praise. So i dont see why you wouldnt continue to praise.
Perhaps for many parents it would be hard to work out what that natural praise or consequence is as the child gets older.
*Propaganda is a concerted set of messages aimed at influencing the opinions or behaviors of large numbers of people. As opposed to impartially providing information, propaganda in its most basic sense presents information in order to influence its audience. Propaganda often presents facts selectively (thus lying by omission) to encourage a particular synthesis, or gives loaded messages in order to produce an emotional rather than rational response to the information presented